Wednesday, February 29, 2012

The Evil Ones

The below was placed as a comment in [this opednews.com article written by David Swanson]:

The Evil Ones cause the problems that they offer the solutions for. I rediscovered Bill Still and his documentary about the Money Changers and is is must see history for those who have any doubt about the reality that is unfolding before our eyes. These people who are in charge are really international bankers, so there is no love, just love of money.

The NDAA is their deed. Anything that involves enslaving and ripping off populations is their deeds. They came to the US shores bearing gifts, blankets with Small Pox on them for the natives, another beginning to their global bio-war and genocide agenda.

Pre 9/11, test cities where cameras and microphones were strung from poles, gun shot detectors, and informants were out paid with tax dollars, such as Stafford Springs, Connecticut. Informants were able to keep half the drugs or tax money police gave them for drug buys. They were supposed to help set up and spy on home owners, small business owners, gun owners, and target families who might stand up against tyranny and be leaders of others for their taxpayer dollars pay. Taxpayer dollars were used to destroy business, break up families, and take taxpayers offline. The Police State was pre-planned. Should international organized crime pay?

-stevengerickson At yahoo.com

[click here] for:

Do the Less than 1% Elite want to start murdering babies?


Psychotic Stick Figure Baby Killer image [stolen from here]

The below re-posted from http://cryptogon.com/?p=27781

University of Melbourne ‘Ethicists’ Call for Legalized Murder of Newborns

February 28th, 2012

Via: Journal of Medical Ethics:

Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus’ health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.

[more]

http://thegetjusticecoalition.blogspot.com/2011/02/letter-text-to-us-vermont-senators.html

http://judicialmisconduct.blogspot.com/2012/02/dcf.html

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Corporation Friendly Rigged Courts?

Judge Dismisses Organic Farmers’ Case Against Monsanto

February 29th, 2012

Via: NPR:

A New York federal court today dismissed a lawsuit against agribusiness giant Monsanto brought by thousands of certified organic farmers. The farmers hoped the suit would protect them against infringing on the company’s crop patents in the future.

The Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association and several other growers and organizations do not use Monsanto seeds. But they were betting that the judge would agree that Monsanto should not be allowed to sue them if pollen from the company’s patented crops happened to drift into their fields.

Instead, the judge found that plaintiffs’ allegations were “unsubstantiated … given that not one single plaintiff claims to have been so threatened.” The ruling also found that the plaintiffs had “overstate[d] the magnitude of [Monsanto's] patent enforcement.” Monsanto brings an average of 13 patent-enforcement lawsuits per year, which, the judge said, “is hardly significant when compared to the number of farms in the United States, approximately two million.”



* * * *

This blogger's videos:
http://www.liveleak.com/c/SvenVonErick

http://judicialmisconduct.blogspot.com/

-

Monday, February 27, 2012

Slaves aren't allowed any privacy, right slave?

No Perceived Privacy Rights in US?



I found the above picture [here] on the web. In the 1800's telegraph lines could be tapped into. If you can't see all the wires from a point to another point, there is no absolute privacy. If you send any signal over air, point to point, your transmissions can be compromised. The US Government has been caught using cut outs tapping into every phone conversation, land line and cell, and capturing all internet traffic. So, it doesn't matter if you have passwords, encryption, or take precautions. All of your electronic communications are being jacked. Can you trust the people who have 24/7 control of your money, your family, your property, your children, and can pinpoint your exact location in keystrokes of elapsed time?

White Male Connecticut State Police Troopers would spy on men they perceived as being competition for the better looking girls and women in a town, married, exclusively dating, single, or even prostitutes. A man could lose his business, property, job, and be railroaded to prison if he was in the way of officers pursuing women for sex. These are the men who are spying on your teenage daughter, your girlfriend, your mother, your sister, or wife. These are the creeps who pour over posts on facebook, listening to her calls, and who want to grope her and see her naked at airports.

Town Hall operatives look at what can be stolen from citizens using unsavory characters in behalf of those who run insurance companies, corporations, are organized criminals, or even are bankers located offshore. People who have an interest in taking away your rights, your freedom, breaking up your family, and have been ripping you off since birth might not have any more use for you once everything that can be stolen, is stolen.

I was asked to be a police informant to set up self-employed people, small business owners, gun owners, and those perceived as potential leaders of resistance for arrests, fine, property and asset confiscation, and for prison before 9/11. Police knew there was coming civil unrest and that an event would come to give them unimagined power. I thought it sleazy and illegal to break laws for police, so I refused. These "police" then toasted me. They used a married woman who is a police informant to set me up. She took a liking to me and confessed that she was offered money to set me up for a false arrest and police beating where I would be charged with felonies to put me in prison for 5 to 15 years. She then told me that I could continue dating her or I would lose my daughter, property, contracting business, and go to prison. I broke up with her finding out she was married and had tried to set me up for prison. Then Connecticut State Police followed me around and terrorized me until I ended up in prison for resisting being beaten up by a police informant sent to attack me on my property.

How does this help taxpayers if tax money is used to take taxpayers offline to no longer pay taxes and consume goods. Doesn't it ruin the economy to put people out of jobs, out of homes, and out of intact families?

My emails were read by police and my phones tapped illegally by police before 9/11. They would mock the content of my emails and phone calls. When I was married, an overweight police officer who lived with his mother came to my house bounced me off my siding, said my wife didn't deserve me, and told me he'd arrest me. He got two morons to make false statements so he could arrest me.

You have no privacy, you don't own anything, and some international banker or corporation owner can decide if you are allowed to live, have a job, have a place to live, if you are allowed to reproduce, or whether you can be scooped up off the street and tortured.

From irregularities in my emails being sent and received, and other tip offs, I know that I have gotten someone's attention. It is not good attention, because last time, I lost everything, and even lost my cloths, handed a prison jumpsuit to wear in a Connecticut jail.

The thing is now, if you are reading this, you realize that you can be next at anytime. Either support other citizens' rights to live free, or hang separately with those who just sit by and wait for the knock on their door, or to just have their door kicked in.

Too few people are willing to state the facts as they see them and act. If only one in a hundred thousand stands up to tyrants, then you all will be slaves. I will rest in pieces.

Who do you blame first? I would blame lawyers, all of them, and the judges who sit on benches. If they did not swear secret oaths to each other, and took their oaths to uphold and protect the US Constitution seriously, we would not now be in this mess. Act.

Click here for my mugshot.

http://thesrv.blogspot.com/

[click here] for Steven G. Erickson LiveLeak.com video uploads

stevengerickson At yahoo.com

Homeland Security


If you want to renew or get a driver's license you need to have Homeland Security, DHS permission. If you want to get a job, you have to have Homeland Security, DHS permission. If you want to continue breathing, you will need Homeland Security, DHS permission.

I recall that Connecticut State Police officers were putting in for overtime to get paid Homeland Security pay for hours they didn't work. These officers when caught allegedly didn't have to pay back money they are stealing from taxpayers and were not criminally charged for fraud and theft. What does that say about Homeland Security? It sounds more like police officers' licenses to rip you off, rape you, torture you, beat you, confine you without hearings, and kill you if you complain.

I resisted being mugged on my property. So now I have a criminal record and most jobs are not possible. I have trouble getting ANY place to live. A police informant was encouraged to attack me so I'd get prison. Am I supposed to love a country where guards in prison kick my ankles with their boots and I supposed to bend over, so they can look up my anal cavity and then move my testicles side to side in any hallway when there are other prisoners, and even female guards walking by? I did nothing wrong. The police state stole my house, kicked me out of my job, broke up my family and lied me to prison. Terrorists wear badges. Lawyers are liars who made it possible.

http://judicialmisconduct.blogspot.com/2011/03/fusion-center-locations-and-information.html

* * * *

Did the a former Connecticut Judge and Connecticut State Police Commissioner run a whorehouse in Connecticut? I ask him here:


[click here]

Hartford Courant Comment in forum written by former Police Commish Spada:


Former Rockville Connecticut Judge and former Connecticut State Police Commissioner Arthur L. Spada

[more]

If you want to understand why we need to End the Fed, The Federal Reserve, a private bank, check out the video embedded in this post:
http://thesrv.blogspot.com/2012/02/money-masters-rothschild-mafia.html

* * * *

I heard the below lawyer speak on Constitutional issues being interviewed on the Alex Jones show. He is someone I might like to talk to.
http://www.emord.com/Jonathan-Emord.html

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Being Put on a Target List for talking about officials

A March 2, 2012 update, for this post is available, [click here], and it refers back here.

Google alert is an interesting tool. If a word search is done on your name you can be alerted. Elected and other officials can have staffers monitor their google alerts. Say something negative about an official and your name can be put on a list to be taken down. Contacting an elected, or other official by email, by phone, by letter, or in person, you can be added to the list. Speak at a public hearing, your name can be put on the list. What happens to people on the list?

Well, look at White Supremest racist radio host Hal Turner. Turner started talking about the alleged private, homosexual lives of two former State of Connecticut Judiciary Committee Legislators Michael P. Lawlor and Andrew J. McDonald and an alleged Judge Mafia in Connecticut. Turner was an alleged paid informant for the FBI who was paid tax dollars to incite citizens to commit illegal acts for political purposes.

The real story of how Hal Turner ended up arrested by the Connecticut State Police Capitol Guards should be an interesting story. That is if the real story is told.

[click here] for post to go with below picture, in post called, "The Hal Turner Diaries"



There is no relation between Hal Turner and Michael Nowacki, none.

Except on how each is investigated and being set up for a fall. Connecticut State Police have a special investigations unit. The Connecticut courts have a Judicial Marshal service which are allegedly their version of spy goons who either go out and terrorize citizens, or who hire "cut outs". There is a union in common for taxpayer paid officials, police officers, and those who work for the judicial branch. There is an alleged connection between the judicial branch manager and the Commissioner of the Connecticut State Police. A Freedom of Information request to see who is investigating, what money is being spent, who is being employed and the tactics being used. Word searches can be manipulated. Citizens' computers can be hacked into officially. Communications are captured, and others who are part of a target's circle are also put under surveillance. Weaknesses are looked for. A target is then set up for an arrest.

Police informants are to keep track of any drug or alcohol use of a target. A target can be attacked by a police informant and only the target with face prison after the arrest. Mental Health authorities are also called into play. If a target is to be evaluated, the target can be put on drugs to make him, or her, appear crazy. Whistleblower Anne Kristine Blake was set up the Manchester Connecticut Police, the DMR Department of Mental Retardation, the Connecticut Court System, and doctors working to put her into a mental hospital. A stamped passport proving Blake was out of the country when police knowingly took false statements to take down Blake was foiled the retaliation plan. [That story with documents].

Putting "Michael Nowacki" of New Canaan Connecticut in a Google word search for a time, [this was the number one result] a post on my main blog with Mike's picture and link to his website. The post disappeared almost entirely from word search results. When there is manipulation of the results an argument can be made that there is something nefarious going on behind the scenes.

I had gone to Connecticut State Senator John A. Kissel about removing Rockville Judge Jonathan J. Kaplan and how Connecticut State Police Officers were harassing me over having proposed Civilian Oversight of Police legislation saying I was kicked out of Connecticut and would be arrested if I didn't shut up and leave Connecticut. John allegedly called the Connecticut State Police telling them I had contacted him and the harassment only worsened. Blog posts on Kissel and Connecticut State Colonel Thomas "The Duck" Davoren were removed from word searches with key words indicating public corruption and police misconduct.

Kissel was aware that I was railroaded to prison, and was key as part of the Judiciary Committee in keeping Kaplan on as a judge even though I was sentenced by Kaplan to a year in prison for resisting being mugged on my property for retaliation for trying to have him removed and for lodging complaints against the Connecticut State Police.

Michael Nowacki has been vocal about New Canaan police misconduct, has lodged complaints against a Connecticut Judge, and has contacted legislators. So, I would assume if a Freedom Information Act is conducted to find out who is paid with tax dollars to spy on Nowacki electronically and how police informants are being used, an interesting story might come out. Nowacki's arrest was probably preplanned for political reasons.

Newspaper hierarchy and those in television and other news organizations meet directly with Connecticut Supreme Court Justice Chase T. Rogers and other judges to decide what can be reported in the media. So, news out of the mainstream is what the powers in a State allow to be published or to go over the airwaves. Nowacki is allegedly supposed to be painted as a nut, so there is not public sympathy for his plight, or anger over how he has been targeted.

Chris Kennedy did months, if not years of legal research. He'd spend 6 months, or so, writing a motion. A judge in Connecticut would just deny the motion, unread. Does this sound like justice in America? Chris Kennedy was then placed on the Connecticut State Police Secret Enemies List and then arrested. I was put on the same list for blogging and for being associated with Chris Kennedy.

Do you want a system of policing, a court system, and government that is a corporate version of the abuse that was the former USSR?

Connecticut State Police told me I was going to get a "hot shot" in prison and I would die, or suffer some horrible disease. At the time the officers were threatening me with this, I was not suspected of any crime, was not on probation, and hadn't been arrested for anything. Officers knew I was to be arrested, that I was to go to prison for whatever offense I was arrested for, they knew the outcome of a trial before it was held. Does this sound like an "American Justice System"? Nowacki's case is unfolding in real time. What police state abuse that is occurring behind the scenes should be looked into.

[click here] for post to go with Michael Nowacki photo, post called "Profiled for contacting elected officials?"



The Steven G. Erickson mugshot can be found in [this post].

-stevengerickson AT yahoo.com

Saturday, February 25, 2012

Manipulation of Google Word Search Results

As of last night, searching "Michael Nowacki", not in quotes the number one result was:
http://starkravingviking.blogspot.com/2012/02/when-moral-outrage-turns-to-action.html

This Michael Nowacki of New Canaan Connecticut post would come up:

When Moral Outrage turns to Action



http://www.no-wackileaks.com/

One man stands up against foreign occupation, a corrupt court system, and demands government act as advertised. Let's see to it that this true patriot isn't hung for his moral outrage turned to action. [more]

The above post doesn't even show up in the first 7 pages today. Google is alleged to have allowed government interference to make certain blogs not show up. The results can be manipulated. This is a form of censorship. If international corporations and banks can fund US government elected officials without limit, the elected officials are bought and paid for. If you don't like it, there is the NDAA where you can be arrested secretly, you will have no hearing, and you can be tortured and killed. This is the new America.

I posted this about Michael Nowacki on Opednews.com:
http://www.opednews.com/Diary/Profiled-for-contacting-el-by-Steven-G-Erickson-120224-197.html

stevengerickson At yahoo.com

[my mugshot and beef]

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

The Spider Web of Deceit

I placed the below comment in [this Opednews.com article], cut and pasted below my comment:

I looked up the bios of a judiciary committee legislators. The majority of the voting block are lawyers who make money networking with other lawyers and by pandering to the judicial branch and to judges. These people belong to secretive religious societies who are throwing millions, if not billions, of dollars in not so benign directions. [This is the post] where I dumped all the bios.

[This man] from New Canaan, Connecticut, is a former major network executive, probably paid in the high hundred thousands, to over a million a year in pay. He has been photographed with the who is who, he has the scary, real inside scoop on what happened in the 2000 US presidential election. He had a front row seat to what is to me, election rigging by insiders "media pool groups". A special room of insiders releases news and polling predicting results to all the networks. [This man] had police armed with shotguns come to his house to arrest him because he is questioning the legitimacy of the US court system. One police officer ran down another police officer with his cruiser in Mike's drive way, oops! Contact elected officials about real issues, get profiled.

I took pictures of life of the 99% and where more are going to live like they do [here].

-stevengerickson At yahoo dot Com


-

The Money Masters Are Living in Fear

Most people in the United States have long suspected that a “shadow government” exists and that the real power in the country resides in that dark location, not in our elected government. The citizens instinctively know that our elected officials are really nothing more than the hired servants of the money masters and are beholden to them if they wish to retain their positions of power. A quick look at the curtain which they hide behind reveals one shadowy organization that represents the interests of these money masters, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association also known as ISDA.

-



Diamond Rated - Best Financial Markets Analysis Article“Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and commerce…and when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate.” – President James Garfield, 2 weeks before his assassination.

Most people in the United States have long suspected that a “shadow government” exists and that the real power in the country resides in that dark location, not in our elected government. The citizens instinctly know that our elected officials are really nothing more than the hired servants of the money masters and are beholden to them if they wish to retain their positions of power.

A quick look at the curtain which they hide behind reveals one shadowy organization that represents the interests of these money masters, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association also known as ISDA. The officers and directors of this organization include some of the largest hedge funds and most of the major banks in the world including the largest banks in the United States. One of the purposes of the ISDA is determine if a “credit event” is actually a default. If a “credit event” is declared to be a default, then Credit Default Swap (CDS) contracts come into play.

Most people have heard of Credit Default Swaps and derivatives, but are not quite sure of what they really are. Before I can continue with this article, I will present a short description of these two financial instruments. Please bear with me on this as things will get interesting shortly.

Credit Default Swaps (CDS) can be generally considered to be insurance policies issued by banks (sellers) and taken out by investors (buyers) to protect against failure among their investments. The problem with them is that while insurance companies are regulated to make sure that the companies have the ability to pay their claims, the CDS issued by the bankers are largely unregulated.

Derivatives are financial instrument whose value is based on the value of another financial instrument. If one looked at a football team: it owns the stadium, has contracts with players, has advertising rights, has television contracts etc. Each one of these is an economic entity capable of generating income. Derivatives could be considered the bets that people place on these teams. (Credit Default Swaps are a form of derivatives).

So what do derivatives and Credit Default Swaps have to do with all this, how do they affect people on the street, and why are the money masters so concerned about them?

Take a look at the following table in a report created by the Bank of International Settlements.

Source: Bank for International Settlements

If you look at the highlighted area, you will see that the total value of Credit Default Swaps for 2011 is a staggering $32,409 BILLION dollars! That is $32 TRILLION, with a “T”! To put this into perspective the gross domestic product (GDP) of the United States in 2010 — the total value of all the goods and services generated in the entire country that year — was $14.6 trillion. The amount of credit default swaps held by the banks dwarfs the entire economic output of the United States. There is no way in hell that these banks could ever pay even a small fraction of these claims. The TOTAL amounts of derivatives is a staggering $707 TRILLION plus a measly few hundred billion more. This entire system is a house of cards just waiting for a single card to fall. There is not enough money on this planet to cover these contracts.

A report by the Comptroller of the Currency has the nation’s five largest banks — JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America, HSBC, and Goldman Sachs — holding nearly 95 percent of the industry’s total exposure to derivatives contracts. This means the 5 largest banks are on the hook for over $30,000 billion for just the CDS they issued.

This is where it starts to get interesting.

Remember earlier in this article I stated that one of the purposes of the ISDA is to determine if a “credit event” is actually a default? If a “credit event” is declared to be a default, then Credit Default Swap (CDS) contracts come into play. Think about this, the very same banks that would have to pay the claims by those who bought these contracts, are in the position of determining if a “credit event” is really a default. All the banks have to do is to NOT declare any default and they do not have to pay! If they did have to pay, and then the house of cards would collapse. The big banks would immediately be insolvent and the money masters live in fear of this.

This lack of a declared default by the ISDA is exactly what brought down MF Global which was speculating heavily on European bonds. What ultimately happened was that an agreement was reached in Europe that that investors would have to take a write-down of 50% on Greek Bond debt. Now MF Global was leveraged anywhere from 40 to 1, to 80 to 1 depending on whose figures you believe. Let’s assume that MF Global was leveraged 40 to 1, this means that they could not even absorb a small 3% loss, so when the “haircut” of 50% was agreed to, MF Global was finished. It tried to stem its losses by criminally dipping into segregated client accounts, and we all know how that ended with clients losing their money.

MF Global may well be just the tip of the iceberg on what still awaits us.

However, MF Global thought that they had risk-free speculation because they had bought these CDS from these big banks to protect themselves in case their bets on European Debt went bad. MF Global should have been protected by its CDS, but since the ISDA would not declare the Greek “credit event” to be a default, MF Global could not cover its losses, causing its collapse.

Think about this for a minute, if you or I paid 50% of our mortgage payment, this would certainly be declared a default. However, in the Greek bond write-down the ISDA did not declare it a default. What you essentially have here is a situation where the banks controlling the ISDA and are essentially determining their own fate.

Now with the talk in Europe being that investors may have to take a write down of 70% on some European debt, will that be declared a default? I doubt it, again because that would drive the 5 biggest banks in the United States into insolvency. The problem becomes, at what point does the ISDA declare a default? At 70%, at 80% , or at 100% if Greece or another country just walk away from their debt? Once a default is declared by the ISDA, the banks are done, and the money masters know this! The conflict of interest in this situation is clear. These banks got to write the insurance , get paid the premiums and yet they have total control over whether they will have to pay.

The money made by selling these derivatives is directly responsible for the huge profits and bonuses we now see on Wall Street. The money masters have reaped obscene profits from this scheme, but now they live in fear that it will all unravel and the gravy train will end. What these banks have done is to leverage the system to such an extreme, that the entire house of cards is threatened by a small country of only 11 million people. Greece could bring the entire world economy down. If a default was declared, the resulting payouts would start a chain reaction that would cause widespread worldwide bank failures making the Lehman collapse look small by comparison.

The ability of these large banks to not pay on the Credit Default Swaps that they wrote, sold and profited from is a travesty. What will happen once other countries like Italy, Spain, and France have bond write downs? This criminal abrogation of contracts exposes something much bigger, the unregulated shadow banking system of derivatives. The Dodd-Frank bill that people thought would regulate the finance industry does little to address the problems of derivatives, largely due to the money masters’ lobbyists that influenced the bought politicians to not put limits on the gravy train. We have a system where: laws are written by the servants of the money masters, the regulators are appointed by these same servants, CDS policies were written by the money masters, premiums were paid to the money masters, fees were taken by the money masters , but no payouts will be permitted by the money masters. Do not expect the paid politicians or regulators to do anything about this.

These titans of Wall Street do not answer to any government or to the public. They have set us all up for a second financial crisis far worse than in 2008. These money masters are humanity’s worst enemy. This is another example of a paper game they have created to enrich themselves, but puts the entire world at risk.

Well, these Masters of the World will be having a themselves a get-together to plan the future of their world.

*The ISDA 27th Annual General Meeting will be held on April 30-May 2, 2012 in Chicago.

*This will be followed by the G8 summit meeting in Chicago on May 19 and May 20.

*Then this will be followed by the NATO summit in Chicago on May 20 and May 21.

During 9-11, it was said that our security services failed to connect the dots. However, here we have a situation where if you analyze this carefully, it is easy to connect the dots.

There is a reason that the ISDA meetings are held first. The G8 and NATO events are the window dressing for public consumption. The real decisions will be made by the money masters so their meeting needed to be held first. At this meeting, the money masters will develop their marching orders for their puppets, the paid servants who are the political leaders who will be in attendance at the G8 conference.

These puppets at the G8 Conference will then create the marching orders for the militaries that they control. However, all the “big picture” planning will have been developed at the ISDA meetings. The money masters live in fear of an economic collapse that they have brought about and they may have need of a military adventure to distract the masses from their crimes. Of course the paid servants will go along with this plan because they do not want to do anything that would change their positions of power. Watch for signs of a bogeyman country orchestrated by the mass media to whip up frenzy in support of war, or possibly even a false flag attack. This media campaign will be another symptom of the fear of the money masters.

The militaries will do what they always do and will blindly follow their orders. The NATO meeting will be used to develop the planning for the execution of the orders developed by the money masters.

With the continued austerity being imposed on the world by these bankers and their agencies such as the IMF, World Bank, and their hired servants our political leaders, a meeting of so many tools in one location is a natural magnet for protestors who are tired of the corruption and greed in the system. The demonstrators will be targeting the puppeteers, not just the puppets.

It is not difficult to imagine that the money masters do not want any of these meetings to be disrupted and that plans have already been made for an overwhelming police presence. There have already been reports of joint military exercises between the Los Angeles police and the military. You can count on the fact that the 1st Amendment will sustain “collateral damage”.

Chris Hedges, a Pulitzer prize winning journalist, has speculated that since the NDAA was opposed by the agencies in the national security establishment including the FBI, NSA, that what might be driving these military exercises is the fear that the bankers do not trust the police to protect them if things turn south.

“And I think, without question, the corporate elites understand that things, certainly economically, are about to get much worse. I think they’re worried about the Occupy movement expanding. And I think that, in the end—and this is a supposition—they don’t trust the police to protect them, and they want to be able to call in the Army.” – Chris Hedges

It is no mistake that Chicago was chosen for the site of these meetings. The powers that be know that the police will meet the protests with violence, but in Illinois, it is illegal to record the police. So the documentation of violence perpetrated in the protection of the interests of the money masters will be significantly reduced. The choice of Chicago for the site of these meetings is another example of the fear of the money masters.

The number and behavior of law enforcement as well as the myriad of other security agencies that will be present during these Chicago meetings will certainly be an indicator of the level of fear that the money masters are feeling as the world they have created on a foundation of theft, fraud, leverage and debt crumbles around them.

The Occupy Movement has been shining a light into the dark recesses that these money masters inhabit. The movement represents a real threat to their privileged positions as the public becomes more and more aware of the fraud and greed perpetrated by them, as they continue to extract even more money from the public. The money masters had their paid servants, the politicians evict the Occupiers from their parks in most cities across the United States. Another example of the fear the money masters have.

But…..

These money masters know now that all they accomplished was to scatter the movement which ultimately only strengthened it even more. The message is now quietly spreading to college campuses and to communities where foreclosures are being fought (further threatening the bottom lines of these same bankers). Every time that the hired politicians send their enforcers, the police to violently repress the movement, the movement grows in strength.

The money masters live in fear that they will not escape the blame for creating the next economic crisis as conditions continue to worsen. The money masters know that nothing has changed since the 2008 collapse and that the number of derivatives has actually grown since then (see chart). You would think that the bankers would have learned their lesson, instead with their myopic focus on their own wealth and greed the derivatives grew to significantly higher levels. These money masters now live in fear of the repercussions of these actions.

Eventually even the police will realize that their pensions are being raided by these money masters. The money masters have been manipulating their politician puppets to enact “pension reforms” that hide their theft in the name of “necessary cutbacks”. The money masters live in fear that ultimately even the police will refuse to protect their interests.

The money masters live in fear that the Occupy Movement will awaken the country from its deep sleep, and that the wrath of the people will turn against these sociopaths who have so manipulated the system in order to enrich themselves with no regard for anyone else. They may have their psychological and physical bunkers to hide in, but the very fact that they need these bunkers, shows their fear.

For more articles by many authors on economic, social, justice, media, and community issues:http://www.endtheillusion.org

By Rudy Avizius

http://www.endtheillusion.org/

Email: rudy@endtheillusion.org

Rudy Avizius is a retired school district administrator and a former Director of Technology who has been following economic and political news very carefully for the last 2 decades. He has recently become active in trying to make sure that the government spends taxpayer money wisely with long term benefits to the nation.

© 2012 Copyright Rudy Avizius - All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.


© 2005-2012 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk




* * * *
* * * *

I placed the below comment in the OpedNews.com Paul Craig Roberts article, cut and pasted, below my comment:
I don't have a job, but am keeping myself fed. I would come up with $40 and donate to Rob's site, Alex Jones, James Corbett Report, or even the religious AM radio national network that provided me with a press pass. I used to carry a press pass as an investigative reporter for the AM network. The word "contractor" could be placed on the press pass, and some basic instructions could be given to maintain the pass of what is expected from a journalist, if Rob, or another independent news site issued press passes for a fee.

The win, would be that sites like Rob's are even more supported.

A former major network executive reached out to me to talk. I looked up the bios of judiciary committee legislators who seem to be bent on seeing he is sent to a mental hospital, or locked up for life, for his exposing their illicit connections to each other. [bios dumped randomly here]

I was kicked out of the State of Connecticut for what I was finding out. Just contacting any elected official, federal or state, can get you profiled for arrest, property loss, break up of family, loss of job, loss of home, and prison.
-Steven G. Erickson


-



Silencing The Critics


By (about the author)

This article cross-posted from paulcraigroberts.org

In 2010 the FBI invaded the homes of peace activists in several states and seized personal possessions in what the FBI -- the lead orchestrator of fake "terrorist plots" -- called an investigation of "activities concerning the material support of terrorism."

Subpoenas were issued to compel antiwar protestors to testify before grand juries as prosecutors set about building their case that opposing Washington's wars of aggression constitutes giving aid and comfort to terrorists. The purpose of the raids and grand jury subpoenas was to chill the anti-war movement into inaction.

Last week in one fell swoop the last two remaining critics of Washington/Tel Aviv imperialism were removed from the mainstream media. Judge Napolitano's popular program, Freedom Watch, was cancelled by Fox TV, and Pat Buchanan was fired by MSNBC. Both pundits had wide followings and were appreciated for speaking frankly.

Many suspect that the Israel Lobby used its clout with TV advertisers to silence critics of the Israeli government's efforts to lead Washington to war with Iran. Regardless, the point before us is that the voice of the mainstream media is now uniform. Americans hear one voice, one message, and the message is propaganda. Dissent is tolerated only on such issues as to whether employer-paid health benefits should pay for contraceptive devices. Constitutional rights have been replaced with rights to free condoms.

The western media demonizes those at whom Washington points a finger. The lies pour forth to justify Washington's naked aggression: the Taliban are conflated with al Qaeda, Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction, Gaddafi is a terrorist and, even worse, fortified his troops with Viagra in order to commit mass rape against Libyan women.

President Obama and members of Congress, along with Tel Aviv, continue to assert that Iran is making a nuclear weapon despite public contradiction by the US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and the CIA's National Intelligence Estimate. According to news reports, Pentagon chief Leon Panetta told members of the House of Representatives on February 16 that "Tehran has not made a decision to proceed with developing a nuclear weapon." However, in Washington facts don't count. Only the material interests of powerful interest groups matter.

At the moment the american Ministry of Truth is splitting its time between lying about Iran and lying about Syria. Recently, there were some explosions in far away Thailand, and the explosions were blamed on Iran. Last October the FBI announced that the bureau had uncovered an Iranian plot to pay a used car salesman to hire a Mexican drug gang to kill the Saudi Ambassador to the US. The White House idiot professed to believe the unbelievable plot and declared that he had "strong evidence," but no evidence was ever released. The purpose for announcing the non-existent plot was to justify Obama's sanctions, which amount to an embargo -- an act of war -- against Iran for developing nuclear energy.

As a signatory to the non-proliferation treaty, Iran has the right to develop nuclear energy. IAEA inspectors are permanently in Iran and report no diversion of nuclear material to a weapons program.

In other words, according to the reports of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the US National Intelligence Estimate, and the current Secretary of Defense, there is no evidence that Iran has nukes or is making nukes. Yet, Obama has placed illegal sanctions on Iran and continues to threaten Iran with military attack on the basis of an accusation that is contradicted by all known evidence.

How can such a thing happen? It can happen because there is no Helen Thomas, who also was eliminated by the Israel Lobby, to question, as a member of the White House press, President Obama why he placed war-like sanctions on Iran when his own CIA and his own Secretary of Defense, along with the IAEA, report that there is no basis for the sanctions.

The idea that the US is a democracy when it most definitely does not have a free watchdog press is laughable. But the media is not laughing. It is lying. Just like the government, every time the US mainstream media opens its mouth or writes one word, it is lying. Indeed, its corporate masters pay its employees to tell lies. That is their job. Tell the truth, and you are history like Buchanan and Napolitano and Helen Thomas.

What the Ministry of Truth calls "peaceful protesters brutalized by Assad's military" are in fact rebels armed and financed by Washington. Washington has fomented a civil war. Washington claims its intention is to rescue the oppressed and abused Syrian people from Assad, just as Washington rescued the oppressed and abused Libyan people from Gaddafi. Today "liberated" Libya is a shell of its former self -- terrorized by clashing militias. Thanks to Obama, another country has been destroyed.

Reports of atrocities committed against Syrian civilians by the military could be true, but the reports come from the rebels who desire Western intervention to put them into power. Moreover, how would these civilian casualties differ from the ones inflicted on Bahraini civilians by the US-supported Bahraini government, the military of which was fortified by Saudi Arabian troops? There is no outcry in the western press about Washington's blind eye to civilian atrocities committed by its puppet states.

How do the Syrian atrocities, if they are real, differ from Washington's atrocities in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, Somalia, Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo prison, and secret CIA prison sites? Why is the american Ministry of Truth silent about these massive, unprecedented, violations of human rights?

Remember also the reports of Serbian atrocities in Kosovo that Washington and Germany used to justify NATO and US bombing of Serbian civilians, including the Chinese consulate, dismissed as another collateral damage. Now 13 years later, a prominent German TV program has revealed that the photographs that ignited the atrocity campaign were grossly misrepresented and were not photographs of atrocities committed by Serbs, but of Albanian separatists killed in a firefight between armed Albanians and Serbians. Serbian casualties were not shown.

The problem that truth faces is that the western media continually lies. On the rare instances when the lies are corrected, it is always long after the event and, therefore, the crimes enabled by the media have been accomplished.

Washington set its puppet Arab League upon Syria in order to establish Syria's isolation among its own kind, the better to attack Syria. Assad forestalled Washington's set-up of Syria for destruction by calling a nationwide referendum on February 26 to establish a new constitution that would extend the prospect of rule beyond the Ba'athists (Assad's party).

One might think that, if Washington and its Ministry of Truth really wanted democracy in Syria, Washington would get behind this gesture of good will by the ruling party and endorse the referendum. But Washington does not want a democratic Syrian government. Washington wants a puppet state. Washington's response is that the dastardly Assad has outwitted Washington by taking steps toward Syrian democracy before Washington can obliterate Syria and install a puppet.

Here is Obama's response to Assad's move toward democracy: "It's actually quite laughable -- it makes a mockery of the Syrian revolution," White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters aboard Air Force One.

Obama, the neoconservatives, and Tel Aviv are really pissed. If Washington and Tel Aviv can figure out how to get around Russia and China and overthrow Assad, Washington and Tel Aviv will put Assad on trial as a war criminal for proposing a democratic referendum.

Assad was an eye doctor in England until his father died, and he was called back to head the troubled government. Washington and Tel Aviv have demonized Assad for refusing to be their puppet. Another sore point is the Russian naval base at Tartus. Washington is desperate to evict the Russians from their only Mediterranean base in order to make the Mediterranean an american lake. Washington, inculcated with neocon visions of world empire, wants its own mare nostrum.


If the Soviet Union were still extant, Washington's designs on Tartus would be suicidal. However, Russia is politically and militarily weaker than the Soviet Union. Washington has infiltrated Russia with NGOs that work against Russia's interests and will disrupt the upcoming elections. Moreover, Washington-funded "color revolutions" have turned former constituent parts of the Soviet Union into Washington's puppet states. Shorn of communist ideology, Washington does not expect Russia to push the nuclear button. Thus, Russia is there for the taking.

China is a more difficult problem. Washington's plan is to cut China off from independent sources of energy. China's oil investment in eastern Libya is the reason Gaddafi was overthrown, and oil is one of the main reasons that Washington has targeted Iran. China has large oil investments in Iran and gets 20% of its oil from Iran. Closing down Iran, or converting it into Washington's puppet state, closes down 20% of the Chinese economy.

Russia and China are slow learners. However, when Washington and its NATO puppets abused the "no-fly" UN resolution concerning Libya and violated the UN resolution by turning it into armed military aggression against Libya's armed forces, which had every right to put down a CIA sponsored rebellion, Russia and China finally got the message that Washington could not be trusted.

This time Russia and China did not fall into Washington's trap. They vetoed the UN Security Council's set-up of Syria for military attack. Now Washington and Tel Aviv (it is not always clear which is the puppet and which is the puppet master) have to decide whether to proceed in the face of Russian and Chinese opposition.

The risks for Washington have multiplied. If Washington proceeds, the information that is conveyed to Russia and China is that they are next in line after Iran. Therefore, Russia and China, both being well-armed with nuclear weapons, are likely to put their foot down more firmly at the line drawn over Iran. If the crazed warmongers in Washington and Tel Aviv, with veins running strong with hubris and arrogance, again override Russian and Chinese opposition, the risk of a dangerous confrontation rises.

Why isn't the american media raising questions about these risks? Is it worth blowing up the world in order to stop Iran from having a nuclear energy program or even a nuclear weapon? Does Washington think China is unaware that Washington is taking aim at its energy supply? Does Washington think Russia is unaware that it is being encircled by hostile military bases?

Whose interests are being served by Washington's endless and multi-trillion dollar wars? Certainly not the interests of the 50 million americans with no access to health care, nor the 1,500,000 american children who are homeless, living in cars, rundown motel rooms, tent cities, and the storm sewers under Las Vegas, while huge amounts of public funds are used to bail out banks and squandered in wars of hegemony.

The US has no independent print and TV media. It has presstitutes who are paid for the lies that they tell. The US government in its pursuit of its immoral aims has attained the status of the most corrupt government in human history. Yet Obama speaks as if Washington is the font of human morality.

The US government does not represent Americans. It represents a few special interests and a foreign power. US citizens simply don't count, and certainly Afghans, Iraqis, Libyans, Somalians, Yemenis, and Pakistanis don't count. Washington regards truth, justice, and mercy as laughable values. Money, power, hegemony are all that count for Washington, the city upon the hill, the light unto nations, the example for the world.


* * * *
* * * *

I cut and pasted the below as I found it on the Kenny's Sideshow blog:

Just in case there is a misunderstanding - Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. in our efforts to identify humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


* * * *

If you would like to help support our ability to show up and produce our own video and post it here, and elsewhere, [click here] and scroll to bottom of post.

-stevengerickson AT Yahoo Dot Com

-

Sunday, February 19, 2012

Police Surveillance for walking in a Park?



There were almost no people out during the day in Lawrence, Massachusetts, February 18, 2012. The above black car, appeared to be a police cruiser. The 50 year old plus, overweight, graying man shadowed me and got out of his car to observe my every move. I was just walking in the park, and decided to start snapping pictures. I have been looking for a setting for a fictional independent movie on the US growing Police State.

Click on photos to make bigger.



Look, the park is just about empty during the day, except for me and a cop.











Looks, pretty tame, but look underneath. The homeless must occupy this place at night. Look at all the beer bottles, burned furniture, bedding, and even makeshift bedrooms in below photos.













stevengerickson At yahoo Dot Com

The less than 1% has ripped off the more than 99%. We could all end up living like this, or being offed by the less than 1% if we don't decide to fight back.

http://starkravingviking.blogspot.com/2012/02/stop-international-banks-and.html

http://thegetjusticecoalition.blogspot.com/2011/02/letter-text-to-us-vermont-senators.html

Friday, February 17, 2012

Preschooler's Homemade Lunch Replaced with Cafeteria "Nuggets"

[the below re-posted from the Carolina Journal]

State agent inspects sack lunches, preschoolers purchase cafeteria food instead

RAEFORD — A preschooler at West Hoke Elementary School ate three chicken nuggets for lunch Jan. 30 because the school told her the lunch her mother packed was not nutritious.

The girl’s turkey and cheese sandwich, banana, potato chips, and apple juice did not meet U.S. Department of Agriculture guidelines, according to the interpretation of the person who was inspecting all lunch boxes in the More at Four classroom that day.

The Division of Child Development and Early Education at the Department of Health and Human Services requires all lunches served in pre-kindergarten programs - including in-home day care centers - to meet USDA guidelines. That means lunches must consist of one serving of meat, one serving of milk, one serving of grain, and two servings of fruit or vegetables, even if the lunches are brought from home.

When home-packed lunches do not include all of the required items, child care providers must supplement them with the missing ones.

The girl's mother - who said she wishes to remain anonymous to protect her daughter from retaliation - said she received a note from the school stating that students who did not bring a "healthy lunch" would be offered the missing portions, which could result in a fee from the cafeteria, in her case $1.25.

"I don't feel that I should pay for a cafeteria lunch when I provide lunch for her from home," the mother wrote in a complaint to her state representative, Republican G.L. Pridgen of Robeson County.

The girl's grandmother, who sometimes helps pack her lunch, told Carolina Journal that she is a petite, picky 4-year-old who eats white whole wheat bread and is not big on vegetables.

"What got me so mad is, number one, don't tell my kid I'm not packing her lunch box properly," the girl's mother told CJ. "I pack her lunchbox according to what she eats. It always consists of a fruit. It never consists of a vegetable. She eats vegetables at home because I have to watch her because she doesn't really care for vegetables."

When the girl came home with her lunch untouched, her mother wanted to know what she ate instead. Three chicken nuggets, the girl answered. Everything else on her cafeteria tray went to waste.

"She came home with her whole sandwich I had packed, because she chose to eat the nuggets on the lunch tray, because they put it in front of her," her mother said. "You're telling a 4-year-old. 'oh. your lunch isn't right,' and she's thinking there's something wrong with her food."

While the mother and grandmother thought the potato chips and lack of vegetable were what disqualified the lunch, a spokeswoman for the Division of Child Development said that should not have been a problem.

"With a turkey sandwich, that covers your protein, your grain, and if it had cheese on it, that's the dairy," said Jani Kozlowski, the fiscal and statutory policy manager for the division. "It sounds like the lunch itself would've met all of the standard." The lunch has to include a fruit or vegetable, but not both, she said.

There are no clear restrictions about what additional items - like potato chips - can be included in preschoolers' lunch boxes.

"If a parent sends their child with a Coke and a Twinkie, the child care provider is going to need to provide a balanced lunch for the child," Kozlowski said.

Ultimately, the child care provider can't take the Coke and Twinkie away from the child, but Kozlowski said she "would think the Pre-K provider would talk with the parent about that not being a healthy choice for their child."

It is unclear whether the school was allowed to charge for the cafeteria lunches they gave to every preschooler in the class that day.

The state regulation reads:

"Sites must provide breakfast and/or snacks and lunch meeting USDA requirements during the regular school day. The partial/full cost of meals may be charged when families do not qualify for free/reduced price meals.

"When children bring their own food for meals and snacks to the center, if the food does not meet the specified nutritional requirements, the center must provide additional food necessary to meet those requirements."

Still, Kozlowski said, the parents shouldn't have been charged.

"The school may have interpreted [the rule] to mean they felt like the lunch wasn't meeting the nutritional requirements and so they wanted the child to have the school lunch and then charged the parent," she said. "It sounds like maybe a technical assistance need for that school."

The school principal, Jackie Samuels, said he didn't "know anything about" parents being charged for the meals that day. "I know they eat in the cafeteria. Whether they pay or not, they eat in the cafeteria."

Pridgen's office is looking into the issue.

Sara Burrows is an associate editor of Carolina Journal.

Editor's note, Feb. 15: The first two paragraphs of this story were updated. Neither DHHS nor school officials would identify the person who inspected the homemade lunches and decided they did not meet USDA guidelines. CJ has made multiple requests to DHHS for clarification. In an email to CJ, department spokeswoman Lori Walston said: "As mentioned in the statement from the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issued last night, this agency is currently working to determine the specifics of this case."



* * * *
* * * *

This blogger, Steven G. Erickson, is looking to talk to people who have been abused by the court system, are a victims of police brutality, or are a victim of DCF DCYF Department of Children and Families, or have public corruption stories. I am Anti-War, meaning I don't want US taxpayers to wars that international corporate owners and bankers want to make themselves richer while reducing those they deem inferior, the "mud people". [That point made here]

-stevengerickson AT yahoo Dot Com

P.S. I am paying attention to abuse in the State of Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Arizona, California, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York City, and in your state or country. Feel free to contact me, maybe we can talk.

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Hospital Workers Prepping Children for Official Kidnapping?

Pretty much everything that is wrong with American Courts, Policing, and Government can be summed up in the below audio interview.

I believe that the US Government is more than partially responsible for the heroin and cocaine abuse problem in the US. The laws seem more dangerous than the drugs.

The system is set up to rip off property, cash, assets, and to break up families and for stealing children. International corporate owners and bankers run the US Government, the Courts, and Policing from inside, and outside, US borders. So, if the system is corrupted, it is corrupt.

State workers lie to keep their jobs, to get promoted, and to enrich themselves, their families, and each other. DCF, or DYCF, workers are no different.

Judges are a rubber stamp of approval on public corruption, judicial misconduct, and police brutality. State Attorney Generals are supposed to take complaints from citizens who are officially violated by the state at the same time they are supposed to defend the state against lawsuits. Can you say, "Major conflict of interest"?

Look at the State of Connecticut, New Hampshire, Georgia, Florida, and other states for an overwhelming number of victims.

-stevengerickson AT yahoo Dot Com

My mugshot and beefs [click here]

-

DCF/DCYF Kidnapping Scam


Text with video:

Uploaded by on Feb 16, 2012

More info: http://judicialmisconduct.blogspot.com/2012/02/dcf.html

Steven G. Erickson interviews Dot Knightly of Nashua, New Hampshire by phone February 16, 2012. Grandparents often suffer because of an out of control judicial system. Family Court is about abuse, breaking up families, and profit for lawyers and other scammers.

We the people need Grand Juries, not tyrannical judges. New Hampshire, Florida, Connecticut, and so many other states are about abuse, not serving taxpayers. It is time to fight back.

Dot Knightly's blog: http://unhappygrammy-grandparentsblog.blogspot.com/



* * * *
* * * *

[This blogger's LiveLeak.com video uploads, click here]

Holding elected officials accountable?:
http://thegetjusticecoalition.blogspot.com/2010/02/holding-elected-officials-accountable.html

-

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Prosecute Obama for Murder in Vermont?



The below was re-posted [from here]

President Barack Obama has not visited Vermont since 2006. At the time, he was laying the ground work for a run for President. WCAX has learned that this is about to change as Obama is set to visit Vermont on 30 March of this year. It should be noted that the last sitting President to visit Vermont was Bill Clinton. George W. Bush visited every other state in the union during his eight years in office, but never visited Vermont.

The visit is campaign related, but details are sketchy right now.

Vermont overwhelmingly voted for Obama in 2008, and will likely vote for him again this year. It would, of course, be nice if President Obama toured more of Vermont than just Burlington given that the state has some major successes as well as some failures. The area around Rutland City, for instance, has lagged behind the rest of the state in terms of job creation, and has seen a spike in drug related crimes of late.



* * * *

If Obama's crimes against humanity and hits to the US Constitution are greater than of George W. Bush, and if there was a push to prosecute Bush in Vermont, why not prosecute Obama for murder in Vermont?

The reasoning to prosecute Bush for murder in Vermont in 2008:


Team Prosecute Bush


Text with video:

Uploaded by on Oct 26, 2008

More information, CLICK HERE:
http://starkravingviking.blogspot.com/2008/10/campaigning-to-prosecute-bush-f...

Vote for Charlotte Dennett for Vermont Attorney General. Vincent Bugliosi will be be on task as special prosecutor to prosecute US President George W. Bush for murder.



Prosecuting Bush, Serving the VT AG


Text with video:

Uploaded by on Oct 28, 2008

Prosecuting Bush, Serving the VT AG



* * * *

[click here] for:

US run by the CWB, Criminals Without Borders



[more]

-

The passage of the NDAA is more than criminal, it is treason.

[click here] for:

ACTA, Obama, and International Protest



[more]

stevengerickson At yahoo Dot com

* * * *

The below re-posted [from here]

REVOLUTION NWO OWNS CORRUPT GOVERMENT HELP RON PAUL 2012


What does Article 61 (Lawful Rebellion) stand for? You have Sovereignty, realize it, and use it.

in Common Law

Lawful Rebellion.

Some one recently asked me the question; what is Lawful Rebellion?

Rebellion
in itself has a number of different meanings and is in fact quite close
to another word that seems to be on everyone's lips; Revolution.
Defined meaning of Rebellion; Refusal to accept some authority or
code or convention. An act or show of defiance toward an authority
or established government.

Defined meaning of Lawful; Being
within the law; allowed by law: lawful methods of dissent. (The lawful
refusal to conform to the authority that is unjust)

Under article
61 of Magna Carta 1215 (the founding document of our Constitution) we
have a right to enter into lawful rebellion if we feel we are being
governed unjustly. Contrary to common belief our Sovereign and her
government are only there to govern us and not to rule us and this must
be done within the constraint of our Common Law and the freedoms
asserted to us by such Law, nothing can become law in this country if it
falls outside of this simple constraint.

Article 61 shows quite
clearly who really holds the power in this country, that being quite
simply us the people; we have Sovereignty not any Parliament and nor can
this be taken from us by any Parliament who claim to have taken the
people's Sovereignty. As defined above any act passed by a Parliament to
remove the power the people possess, or to remove the power from the
point of constraint we invested the power in, is invalid as it falls
outside of the constraint laid down by Common/Constitutional Law.

This
is a simple safeguard put in place to protect our freedoms under said
law and to never allow such freedoms to be removed or diminished. So in
reality any Act, Statute and subsequent law or legislation formed by
these actions, that effects our freedoms asserted to us, is quite
evidently unjust, invalid and most certainly illegal.

By invoking
article 61 we are quite clearly stating that we feel we are being
governed unjustly and after giving the head of state (Her Majesty) 40
day's to correct this, if this is not corrected, then we can simply
enter into lawful rebellion and we do this under the full protection of
our Constitutional Law.

Lawful rebellion allows quite simply for
the following recourse; Full refusal to pay any forms of Tax, Fines
and any other forms of monies to support and/or benefit said unlawful
governance of this country. Full refusal to abide by any Law,
Legislation or Statutory Instrument invalidly put in place by said
unlawful governance that is in breech of the Constitutional safeguard.
To hinder in any way possible all actions of the treasonous
government of this land, who have breeched the Constitutional safeguard;
defined with no form of violence in anyway, just lawful hindrance under
freedom asserted by Constitutional Law and Article 61.

Above are
listed the three main ways we can as a people rely upon article 61 and
what this allows for. The British people were given over 700 years ago a
Law to use as there recourse when faced with either a Parliamentary
dictatorship, or a Sovereign trying to rule by Divine Right, which
amounts to the same thing. We have a right, and a birth right at that,
to be governed properly under our birth right law and no other and
certainly not by laws introduced on the pretence of being British Law,
when in fact all laws passed since 1973 have been European laws in the
guise of British law. We have a right to freedom within our true law and
no Parliament can remove this for they were not present in its
implementation nor did it need any Parliament, or any Parliament
involvement, this was quite simply a deal struck between the people and a
Sovereign, a deal which can never be broken.

The traitors that
reside in the Parliament of this country only fear one thing and that
quite simply is us the people and they know that they can never defend
themselves, or defend their treasonous actions, lies and deceit against
the power of the people, asserted by and given by, the founding document
of our Constitution Magna Carta 1215. They realize, as many others do,
that once the British public grasps the power of Magna Carta in both
hands and start to use it in their defense; their game is quite simply
up.

What does Magna Carta stand for?

In stands for
freedom, that the people have Sovereignty that cannot be removed by
anyone and it stands for the only real true rule of law; that no one,
without exception, is above the law.

What does Article 61 (Lawful Rebellion) stand for? You have Sovereignty, realize it, and use it.
Mirror: http://www.youtube.com/user/edtheball69

* * * *
* * * *

stevengerickson AT yahoo Dot Com

[click here] for:

Target on Enemies List



[more]

The Globalists want to rape your children after they take them away. Check out [this DCF story]. Department of Children and Families in US States like Georgia, Florida, and Connecticut get federal tax dollars to officially kidnap children and to railroad small business owning, home owning, family raising taxpayers to prison. Get in the way of State Police heroin and cocaine trafficking, illegal gun confiscation, their armed revenue collecting, cash and asset confiscation scam, prostitution, White Sexual Slavery, sex with children scam, court case rigging, and furthering of the US International Corporate Bankster Police State and get toasted.

http://thesrv.blogspot.com/2012/02/red-fellas-jewish-mafia-exposed.html

Most blogs will let you go to newest posts by clicking on top banner.

-