Sunday, February 12, 2012

Prosecute Obama for Murder in Vermont?

The below was re-posted [from here]

President Barack Obama has not visited Vermont since 2006. At the time, he was laying the ground work for a run for President. WCAX has learned that this is about to change as Obama is set to visit Vermont on 30 March of this year. It should be noted that the last sitting President to visit Vermont was Bill Clinton. George W. Bush visited every other state in the union during his eight years in office, but never visited Vermont.

The visit is campaign related, but details are sketchy right now.

Vermont overwhelmingly voted for Obama in 2008, and will likely vote for him again this year. It would, of course, be nice if President Obama toured more of Vermont than just Burlington given that the state has some major successes as well as some failures. The area around Rutland City, for instance, has lagged behind the rest of the state in terms of job creation, and has seen a spike in drug related crimes of late.

* * * *

If Obama's crimes against humanity and hits to the US Constitution are greater than of George W. Bush, and if there was a push to prosecute Bush in Vermont, why not prosecute Obama for murder in Vermont?

The reasoning to prosecute Bush for murder in Vermont in 2008:

Team Prosecute Bush

Text with video:

Uploaded by on Oct 26, 2008

More information, CLICK HERE:

Vote for Charlotte Dennett for Vermont Attorney General. Vincent Bugliosi will be be on task as special prosecutor to prosecute US President George W. Bush for murder.

Prosecuting Bush, Serving the VT AG

Text with video:

Uploaded by on Oct 28, 2008

Prosecuting Bush, Serving the VT AG

* * * *

[click here] for:

US run by the CWB, Criminals Without Borders



The passage of the NDAA is more than criminal, it is treason.

[click here] for:

ACTA, Obama, and International Protest


stevengerickson At yahoo Dot com

* * * *

The below re-posted [from here]


What does Article 61 (Lawful Rebellion) stand for? You have Sovereignty, realize it, and use it.

in Common Law

Lawful Rebellion.

Some one recently asked me the question; what is Lawful Rebellion?

in itself has a number of different meanings and is in fact quite close
to another word that seems to be on everyone's lips; Revolution.
Defined meaning of Rebellion; Refusal to accept some authority or
code or convention. An act or show of defiance toward an authority
or established government.

Defined meaning of Lawful; Being
within the law; allowed by law: lawful methods of dissent. (The lawful
refusal to conform to the authority that is unjust)

Under article
61 of Magna Carta 1215 (the founding document of our Constitution) we
have a right to enter into lawful rebellion if we feel we are being
governed unjustly. Contrary to common belief our Sovereign and her
government are only there to govern us and not to rule us and this must
be done within the constraint of our Common Law and the freedoms
asserted to us by such Law, nothing can become law in this country if it
falls outside of this simple constraint.

Article 61 shows quite
clearly who really holds the power in this country, that being quite
simply us the people; we have Sovereignty not any Parliament and nor can
this be taken from us by any Parliament who claim to have taken the
people's Sovereignty. As defined above any act passed by a Parliament to
remove the power the people possess, or to remove the power from the
point of constraint we invested the power in, is invalid as it falls
outside of the constraint laid down by Common/Constitutional Law.

is a simple safeguard put in place to protect our freedoms under said
law and to never allow such freedoms to be removed or diminished. So in
reality any Act, Statute and subsequent law or legislation formed by
these actions, that effects our freedoms asserted to us, is quite
evidently unjust, invalid and most certainly illegal.

By invoking
article 61 we are quite clearly stating that we feel we are being
governed unjustly and after giving the head of state (Her Majesty) 40
day's to correct this, if this is not corrected, then we can simply
enter into lawful rebellion and we do this under the full protection of
our Constitutional Law.

Lawful rebellion allows quite simply for
the following recourse; Full refusal to pay any forms of Tax, Fines
and any other forms of monies to support and/or benefit said unlawful
governance of this country. Full refusal to abide by any Law,
Legislation or Statutory Instrument invalidly put in place by said
unlawful governance that is in breech of the Constitutional safeguard.
To hinder in any way possible all actions of the treasonous
government of this land, who have breeched the Constitutional safeguard;
defined with no form of violence in anyway, just lawful hindrance under
freedom asserted by Constitutional Law and Article 61.

Above are
listed the three main ways we can as a people rely upon article 61 and
what this allows for. The British people were given over 700 years ago a
Law to use as there recourse when faced with either a Parliamentary
dictatorship, or a Sovereign trying to rule by Divine Right, which
amounts to the same thing. We have a right, and a birth right at that,
to be governed properly under our birth right law and no other and
certainly not by laws introduced on the pretence of being British Law,
when in fact all laws passed since 1973 have been European laws in the
guise of British law. We have a right to freedom within our true law and
no Parliament can remove this for they were not present in its
implementation nor did it need any Parliament, or any Parliament
involvement, this was quite simply a deal struck between the people and a
Sovereign, a deal which can never be broken.

The traitors that
reside in the Parliament of this country only fear one thing and that
quite simply is us the people and they know that they can never defend
themselves, or defend their treasonous actions, lies and deceit against
the power of the people, asserted by and given by, the founding document
of our Constitution Magna Carta 1215. They realize, as many others do,
that once the British public grasps the power of Magna Carta in both
hands and start to use it in their defense; their game is quite simply

What does Magna Carta stand for?

In stands for
freedom, that the people have Sovereignty that cannot be removed by
anyone and it stands for the only real true rule of law; that no one,
without exception, is above the law.

What does Article 61 (Lawful Rebellion) stand for? You have Sovereignty, realize it, and use it.

* * * *
* * * *

stevengerickson AT yahoo Dot Com

[click here] for:

Target on Enemies List


The Globalists want to rape your children after they take them away. Check out [this DCF story]. Department of Children and Families in US States like Georgia, Florida, and Connecticut get federal tax dollars to officially kidnap children and to railroad small business owning, home owning, family raising taxpayers to prison. Get in the way of State Police heroin and cocaine trafficking, illegal gun confiscation, their armed revenue collecting, cash and asset confiscation scam, prostitution, White Sexual Slavery, sex with children scam, court case rigging, and furthering of the US International Corporate Bankster Police State and get toasted.

Most blogs will let you go to newest posts by clicking on top banner.


No comments: