Wednesday, February 29, 2012

The Evil Ones

The below was placed as a comment in [this article written by David Swanson]:

The Evil Ones cause the problems that they offer the solutions for. I rediscovered Bill Still and his documentary about the Money Changers and is is must see history for those who have any doubt about the reality that is unfolding before our eyes. These people who are in charge are really international bankers, so there is no love, just love of money.

The NDAA is their deed. Anything that involves enslaving and ripping off populations is their deeds. They came to the US shores bearing gifts, blankets with Small Pox on them for the natives, another beginning to their global bio-war and genocide agenda.

Pre 9/11, test cities where cameras and microphones were strung from poles, gun shot detectors, and informants were out paid with tax dollars, such as Stafford Springs, Connecticut. Informants were able to keep half the drugs or tax money police gave them for drug buys. They were supposed to help set up and spy on home owners, small business owners, gun owners, and target families who might stand up against tyranny and be leaders of others for their taxpayer dollars pay. Taxpayer dollars were used to destroy business, break up families, and take taxpayers offline. The Police State was pre-planned. Should international organized crime pay?

-stevengerickson At

[click here] for:

Do the Less than 1% Elite want to start murdering babies?

Psychotic Stick Figure Baby Killer image [stolen from here]

The below re-posted from

University of Melbourne ‘Ethicists’ Call for Legalized Murder of Newborns

February 28th, 2012

Via: Journal of Medical Ethics:

Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus’ health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.


No comments: