Sunday, July 18, 2010

Anatomy of Blacklisting in the USA and UK

The below re-posted from:

If you have children, they're targets, and if you're reading this, and are politically active, you're a target. How does the list work?

Kiddie Prison USA by Citizen X

Children are being identified from an early age as potential criminals, and more importantly, risks to the publicly corrupt politicized police running the Police State. What is an individual's chance of being struck by lightning? Well you have to understand probability and statistics to understand the blacklisting game.

Patterns of abuse can be detected by stringing bad luck police, court, and life instances together and asking if probability and statistics would show that it would be unlikely unless the person is a target. Clicking on this post, political blogs, and showing up at political public events and protests can cause your arrest, family break up, loss of your home, your job, and may even land you in prison.

It is rumored that anyone who has ever clicked on is on a list.

Ken Krayeske on Secret Police Enemies List by Steven G. Erickson

If you are high on the watch list, your picture, vehicle information, who you associate with, addresses you frequent, are distributed at roll call for all nearby police departments for all three shifts, that you are to be arrested on sight for any excuse. Just ask journalist Ken Krayeske, former Green Party campaign manager for Connecticut Governor. Ken was critical of Governor M. Jodi Rell. Rell's staff has a google alert for Rell's name, anyone talking negatively about Rell in the media, or on the internet, was put on the list. Kenneth Krayeske was arrested on sight for standing on a sidewalk, facing years in prison.

If you are farther down the list, non-relevant newspaper clippings, other cases, or even complaints against police officers or judges will be put in court folders that only judges see. You'll get the shaft in a divorce, child custody, any civil matters, and will face a major barbecue for even the slightest criminal allegation, legitimate or not. Get on the list, you will have bad luck in all courts, all over, for life.

Get stopped by police anywhere, and if you're on the list, you are going to have very bad luck. Have a car that a police officer or someone he/she knows, wants, you can be placed on the list. Have a spouse or significant other, someone else "more important than you" wants, be placed on the list to take you out of the picture. Be competition for a "connected" business and be placed on the list and soon go out of business, financially ruined possibly getting a bogus criminal record.

Anonymous calls can be placed to your boss, child protective services, false rumors given to family members and friends, etc is used to ruin your reputation and prevent justice. State registered confidential police informants have long been used to beat up, kill, and falsely imprison citizens on the list. Police officers breaking ranks can be beaten up by informants, killed, booted off the force, and/or end up in prison. If you own a business or property expect bad luck with the health inspector, building inspector, and state and federal tax authorities.

USDOJ whistleblower Jesselyn Radack exposed corruption and was put on the "No Fly List". Bradley Birkenfeld blew the whistle on UBS. As a whistleblower he got a long federal prison sentence in retaliation, those committing serious bank fraud and felonies seemed to be given a slap on the wrist.

Is this the America you were taught about in school growing up? If not, let's do something to correct the problem.

Steven G. Erickson is a freelance cameraman, blogger, photographer, documentary producer, screenwriter, sometimes journalist, and can and will travel anywhere if the terms are right. His objective is to reform America's (more...)

* * * *

From the 2008 Minneapolis Minnesota Free Press Event. An ACLU hearing:

* * * *

Steven G. Erickson's complaint to the Connecticut State Police about the Connecticut State Police and Connecticut Kangaroo Court System:

Leonard C. Boyle is now back working with the FBI, now in a position at the very top of the heap, but is not the top guy.



[click here] for:

Where is stolen $5 + Trillion US Tax Dollars?



[click here] for:

Did the Banks really write the "Banking Legislation"?


Richard Hettler claims police and federal law enforcement came to his house and held guns to his head, making him fear for his life if he pursued judicial misconduct complaints against Minneapolis Minnesota Judge Montgomery and if he ratted out bankster Tom Petters for stealing millions from him (Hettler) and railroading him to prison to cover up their crimes.
[click here for video and post]


Steven G. Erickson, in 2010, continues to suffer police inaction, rigged court cases, and suffered failure of taxpayer paid "Protect and Serve" Services, probably from originally having been blacklisted in Connecticut. [The Brattleboro Vermont Fiasco with links to videos]

Monday, July 12, 2010

Free Speech. Is Massachusetts unsafe?

In Massachusetts, it is illegal to video police involved in acts of brutality or misconduct. At the same time, it doesn't seem to be illegal for police in the State of Massachusetts to break laws and ignore the US Constitution.

The below is re-posted
[from here]:

Greenfield, MA PD Arrest & Intimidate Activists For Filming

Posted on 04 July 2010 by Pete Eyre (104)

Short Overview

(written by Adam Mueller and edited by Pete Eyre)

On Thursday, July 1st 2010 Pete and I headed into the Franklin County Jail to bail out Rich Paul, who had been arrested the day before. We were initially told that we could not film in the lobby by Franklin County Sheriff’s but later were told we could do so. We left and 15 minutes later returned with the bail money and Pete’s ID but were then told that we were not permitted to film on the property. We stated that public officials can be recorded while conducting their duties, that no one in the building had any expectation of privacy and that we had our cameras as a means of protection as well as accountability for everyone involved. It was those with badges who then took action against us for standing our ground and doing what we believe is right – actions that did not harm anything.

Sgt. Todd M. Dodge placed myself and Pete under arrest without disclosing what we were actually being arrested for. We were taken to the Greenfield Police Department where we were abused, finger printed, photographed, stripped and had our personal possessions stolen from us. The police, under the watch of Sgt. Dodge, threw us into a cage without blankets, a phone call or telling us exactly what we were being charged with. The jail, with concrete floors, was extremely cold. We were monitored via a camera in the ceiling. We did anything we could to keep warm and to occupy our minds/time. We did chants of ‘no victim no crime,’ sang songs, preached libertarianism and even did a workout.

Finally after 12 + hours in our cages we were taken to court to face a judge. We finally learned what our charges were: felony wiretapping and resisting arrest for us both Pete also has felony firearm/ammo and VIN manipulation charges. We were released on personal recognizance and have court dates on July 29th and Aug 2nd.

Feel free to read the more below and stay tuned to for updates here at

Exhaustive Overview

(written by Pete Eyre and edited by Adam Mueller)


  • On Wed., June 30th in the afternoon our friends Rich Paul and Mark Capuzzo and their friend Jackie were arrested while traveling through MA by the “State Police”. They were charged with allegedly having marijuana and a handgun.
  • On Thur. July 1st at 2:55pm I posted the following to my Facebook: “Leaving Manch in MARV w/ Adam M. Mueller Ⓥ & heading to Greenfield, MA to hopefully help free Rich Paul & Mark Capuzzo from their cage. If you can help pay their bail pls send $ through PayPal to “” and Allison Gibbs Ⓥ will coordinate w/ us. Thanks in advance!”
  • Knowing the harshness of man-made legislation in MA toward victim disarmament we put out a call via Porc411 before leaving the ’shire and asked if anyone would let us leave some property with them. Thanks to some friends this was done.
  • We arrived in Greenfield and parked MARV along the curb on Conway Rd. facing south. There were no signs indicating that our location violated any man-made legislation (we later went back and took pictures of the area to prove this). We locked MARV’s windows, drew the curtains and shades and closed and locked the door.

Franklin County Jail

  • Adam and I walked into the jail just after 6pm. We approached the front desk and informed the attendant that we wanted to pay the ransom on our friends Rich Paul and Mark Capuzzo. We were asked if we were filming. We responded in the affirmative. We were asked to turn off our cameras. Over the next 10min we had a conversation with the attendant and a few of his colleagues. We asked why it was alright for them to film us (there were multiple cameras mounted on the ceiling recording everyone present) but not for us to film them, especially as they, as government employees, work for us.
  • One man, about to end his shift asked “Are you guys 4409? Are you with 4409?” And cautioned his colleagues that we may be 4409 (referring to the awesome Phoenix-based activist whom we met last year). We noted that we were friends with and supporters of 4409.
  • When a supervisor (older, wearing a white shirt) walked by we asked him if it was alright that we filmed while there. He told us that it was a security risk to film while in the jail. Adam clarified that we had no intention of going into the jail but were going to remain in the lobby to get our friends. The supervisor walked to the attendant and told him to let us film, to count our money and check my DL and to get us on our way. The attendant started to proceed as instructed but we informed him that we had to get the money from the ATM at the grocery store as we had been unsure of the amounts of ransom demanded for Rich and Capuzzo. We were told we’d have to fork over $500 for Rich and ten times that for Capuzzo. Unfortunately we didn’t have enough to get both guys out so we agreed to focus on getting Rich out for the time being.

Grocery Store

  • It was about 6:30pm. We crossed the jail’s parking lot and walked back to MARV to get my DL, staying just a minute or two before leaving for the ATM in the grocery store. When almost at the doors of the store a car with “Greenfield Police Department” decals sped to a stop diagonally in the driving lane and a man later identified as Todd M. Dodge asked from his window “Do you plan on going back up there?” I replied “Where?” at the same time Adam said “Yup.” Dodge exited the vehicle and walked toward us.
  • Dodge asked “Are you recording me? Are you audio recording? Because that’s illegal in Massachusetts”. Adam and I kept walking toward the store with Dodge trailing. I asked: “Are we being detained?” “No” Dodge replied. “So we’re free to go?”, I asked and Dodge replied, “Yes.” Adam and I left the scene and entered the store. Dodge returned to his vehicle.
  • I withdrew cash to cover Rich’s ransom and walked back to the jail.


  • Adam and I walked into the lobby and approached the counter. The attendant informed us that we could no longer film there. I proceeded to count out the money and lay it, along with my ID, on the counter as previously requested. We continued to question why our ability to film in the lobby had arbitrarily been changed in the 10-15 min. we had been gone. The attendant provided no clear answer. Eventually he was joined by two colleagues and Dodge, who had parked outside.
  • One of the reasons that we supposedly could no longer film proffered by the men with badges was that their claimed concerned about the privacy of others in the lobby. We noted that we did our best to only film ourselves and those who’s salaries are paid via stolen money. And we questioned the double-standard they vocalized – that we could not film but that they, who purport to work for us, could. This continued for ~10min. Eventually Adam indicated that we could eliminate this concern for the time being by continuing the conversation on the sidewalk immediately outside the lobby. Everyone migrated.
  • Outside almost immediately we were ordered to turn off our cameras – a threat, they stated, that if not followed, would result in our arrest for trespassing. We again continued to point out the double-standard they were enforcing – that they could film but we could not, that the policy they cited wasn’t clear as what was now supposedly banned had earlier been approved and that their facility itself was public property. Moments later Dodge grabbed Adam’s wrist and twisted it back, stealing his camera. Other men with badges moved to reinforce Dodge and descend upon me. We did not resist but went limp. Adam was dragged to a car and forced inside. I was carried to another car.

Greenfield Police Department

  • During the drive I questioned the man who was bringing me to a cage. I asked him to think about his actions, noting that I had not violated the rights of anyone else. I told him that he alone was responsible for his actions – that he could not justify what he was doing simply because someone with more metal pinned to their chest instructed him to do so, or because it was so dictated on a piece of paper. He didn’t disengage. My opening to distinguish between natural law and arbitrary man-made legislation came after he proclaimed that we are given our rights from the government. Soon I touched on Public Choice Theory. Adam later told me he remained silent on his ride to jail.
  • We were met at their headquarters by more men with badges. It was probably just after 7pm. We both noted that though we were peaceful and would not resist, we were not going to help them trample our rights by actively helping them. We were roughly carried inside while being mocked.
  • Neither of us provided our names. They asked if I was “Peter Eyre” – the name on the DL I carried when attempting to pay Rich’s ransom. I replied “That was the ID I was carrying.” I was searched by being picked up and placed on the floor and rolled so they could access my pockets. My shoes and socks were removed. Other property was taken from me, including a set of keys was found, which they assumed were for a RV. One of the men later left with the keys and from what we can piece together, delivered them to his colleagues who were watching the RV, which was parked a couple of miles away. Inside MARV (more later) they found an ID that listed its owner as “Adam Mueller”.
  • Adam was brought into Dodge’s office. Also present was Marcus Paulin who too had a badge pinned to his chest. Adam overheard Dodge on the phone mention that they may just have to break the window of the RV to gain access, apparently trying to intimate Adam and cause him to admit that it was in fact our RV. Adam asked “What would you do if I broke a window into your home?” Dodge replied, “I’d fucking kill you.” Adam pointed out this double-standard while Dodge continued his aggressive, standoffish questioning of Adam. Meanwhile, I was questioned by three men with badges on their chests. They laughed about their use of force against me and Adam. One man with a badge told me it was wrong to call our destination cages since they had no bars. Then he smirked. I told him that whatever the construction of the cells they were still a cage built to deny freedom of movement – something we had done nothing to deserve.
  • I asked the men at what point do they believe it right to stand up to unjust arbitrary man-made legislation. I asked them at when would it have been alright for the Jews in Nazi Germany to not comply – when it was dictated that a gold star be added to their clothes? When their property was raided and stolen? When they were forced into ghettos? When they were loaded onto trains like cattle and offloaded in camps? When they were ordered by people “just doing their job” to kneel in front of a big pit filled with bodies or walk into a gas chamber? I was told, after a laugh, that that scenario was history and that it had happened under a different government altogether. I stated that these were the types of things have have happened historically and are happening today due to the incentives inherent in an unchecked institution that relies on force to operate and the belief that some people have authority over other people.
  • Adam was carried from Dodge’s office to a chair positioned in front of an ink pad and paper cards. I was carried into Dodge’s office, questioned and photographed (including my tattoos) – the same process to which Adam had just been subjected.
  • I was carried to the fingerprinting chair and was fingerprinted. Like Adam before me, I did not resist nor did I assist. I could hear someone chanting. It was Adam. The men with badges pinned to their costume vocally deciphered what he was saying – “No victim. No crime. Peaceful people shouldn’t be put in cages”. Then they laughed. Adam continued for the next hour or two.
  • I was then dragged to my cell by Paulin and another man. It was at the complete opposite end of the cells from where Adam had been caged. I was hefted out of the chair and told that a more-thorough search of my pants had to be done. I was asked if I would assist. I declined. Two grown men – strangers – removed my pants. The same had happened to Adam.
  • On their way out I encouraged Paulin and one other man to think about the morality of their actions. Paulin paused with the sliding cell door open and looked me straight in the eye and told me “I’m with you. Probably more than you think.” I asked him why he wouldn’t then act based on what he knew right. That he could speak out against this institution of violence. I told him he’d be a hero. He said “Not to my family.” I said, “Sure, it may not be an easy decision. You have years invested. But if your family trusts you they’ll respect your decision and will be open-minded to learning why you quit. I told him that a friend, Brad Jardis, had left his position as a “peace officer” in NH due to his moral disagreement with drug prohibition. I pointed out the welcoming and supportive community in which Jardis now finds himself. He closed the door slowly and left. It was about 8:30pm.
  • My cell had cinder-block walls, a steel sink/toilet combo with no toilet paper, and a concrete floor and ceiling and a raised concrete bench/sleeping area.
  • I joined Adam’s chant and over the next couple of hours we kept it going. No one ever communicated with us.
  • We tried to sleep but it was cold. We found that to communicate we had to yell a few words at once due to the echos in the cages. We decided to do an impromptu workout to stay warm and mitigate our boredom. Incline pushups, dips and crunchies were in store.
  • It was after midnight. We balled up and were still freezing. We banged the door repeatedly and asked for someone to bring us a blanket but none ever came. Out of the silence came a voice in the ceiling – a man who identified himself only as a “dispatcher”. He informed me that he was alone in the facility but would radio for someone to stop by and help us. We waited. A couple hours later James Rode – who too had a metal badge on his costume – arrived. He asked what we needed. I informed him that we had been locked-up and not informed of our charges. That we were cold and were never given blankets. And that we’d not yet made a phone call. He asked me twice in an accusatory tone if I was being truthful about the last point. He said that if what I told him was verified by the call log I would be able to make a call. He left. We heard him on the phone. He mentioned Free Keene. Then we never saw him again.
  • It was still very cold. We tried to sleep. I did jumping jacks and pushups to stay warm. Adam paced. He was told by the “dispatcher” that “Even rodents get used to their environments.” We weren’t happy.
  • At around 5am a man with a metal badge on his costume came in and asked if we wanted breakfast. We both declined, noting that we didn’t want to justify the gun placed to the heads of those living in the area who’s money was stolen to pay for the food.
  • Around 6am we were told via the very-real voice of Big Brother in the ceiling that we would leave in 15 min. for court. We were excited for a (hopefully warmer) change in environment. Over the next hour and a half we were told by the dispatcher and other officers that we would leave in 15 min. We finally did.
  • As Adam was putting his shoes on he asked Dodge, “Did you think about what you did to us? You had a chance to be a ‘peace officer’ yet you choose to use force.” Dodge replied, “I slept fine.” To which Adam said, “You may not see it today or tomorrow but one day you’ll realize someone here used force against peaceful people who’ve harmed no one. And it wasn’t me.” Dodge then told Adam that he’s (Adam) just a two-time drug felon who’s the scum of the earth and will be in and out of the system the rest of his life. Adam replied, “Vices aren’t crimes. You see it this way today but one day you’ll realize.”

Greenfield District Court

  • We were handcuffed, surrounded by men with guns, placed into what’s essentially a cage on wheels and “transported” (really a pc way of saying shipped like cattle) to the courthouse. The man who drove us went 40mph in a 20mph and failed to buckle our seat belts. We pointed out the unaccountability of his actions. He was unresponsive. We continued anyways. His response: crank up the volume of the radio. I yelled over the sound, “You can try to ignore the reason and morality on which the points we’re making are based but you know deep down in your heart of hearts that what you’re doing is wrong. You can try to justify this by telling yourself that you’re just doing your job but how would you feel if your relative was sitting in this position right now? We are peaceful people and haven’t violated anyone’s rights. You alone are responsible for your actions. You can stop this car and let us out.” This continued the entire ride.
  • We parked and were greeted by Dodge and other men with badges. Adam informed Dodge of the the man-made legislation ignored during our transport and Dodge said “Good.” On the way inside I pointed out to Dodge the sub-par conditions in which he left us the previous night. Dodge said he had slept “Just great.” I advised him to think about how that bed was bought – with money stolen from people – and how Adam and I, who hadn’t violated anyone’s rights, had been treated. He seemed nonplussed.
  • We went through intake, both declining to take public defenders, again due to the taxpayer liability. We were each assigned a lawyer to help with our bail proceedings that day. Adam lucked-out with Timothy J. Flynn who happens to be a libertarian. My court-appointed lawyer for the day was Jon Heyman. We gave them some background about how we ended up there. Adam was told he was being charged with felony wiretapping and resisting. I was told I had those same charges as well as a felony firearms/ammo charge and a misdemeanor VIN manipulation. And we both may also be charged with trespassing but that was never made clear.
  • Heyman left and came back. He told me he’d run into some people who knew us – a lawyer from the ’shire (Lance Weber) and Antigone Darling. That was great news, especially as we hadn’t had any communication with the outside world since we’d been arrested. Heyman asked me how much he thought we may be able to raise for bail.
  • We were led to the courtroom. Just before I got there Heyman pulled me aside and said the man called “District Attorney” would be willing to let me walk without bail so long as I signed a document that indicated that I would not, until the conclusion of the case, possess firearms or ammunition. I told him that since I own myself I have the right to defend myself and thus would not part with a tool that helps to facilitate that. Also, that I often open carry so I was not willing to agree to such terms. He was worried I may not be allowed to leave that day so I asked if the terms could just be narrowed to the arbitrary political boundaries of MA, which really didn’t change anything since I don’t have a Firearms Identification Card (FID) (man-made legislation that “allows” people to carry a firearm and ammo in MA). The “District Attorney” agreed.
  • Antigone and Lance greeted us in the courtroom.
  • Adam Mueller was released on his own recognizance and will return on July 29th for pre-trial. I was released on his own recognizance with the exception noted above and will return on Aug. 2nd for “Cont.” . . .


  • Though we thought MARV (our RV) had been searched we weren’t 100% sure the cops were telling the truth or if they were just attempting to use that to get us to talk. When we were finally released from custody Lance informed us that the RV had in fact had been searched and towed. Under what authority I still don’t know.
  • We grabbed a bite at Hope & Olive (across the street from court) with Antigone (thanks for lunch!) and Lance and caught each other up on related news.
  • Lance drove us to stopped by Koch’s Automotive Inc. (413.773.9043 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 413.773.9043 end_of_the_skype_highlighting) who had towed MARV. I paid $285 to get MARV out of impound. We were told from an employee that the RV had first been towed to the Greenfield PD parking lot where it was searched then they were called back about 30 minutes later at which point they brought it to their property. We were charged $90 for each of the tows (the rest of the bill was for “labor”). We entered and found MARV trashed. Since we didn’t have our cameras Antigone captured the destruction on her cellphone.
  • We were shocked that these men broke into our home and destroyed our property with no cause. This was a clear sign of retaliation as opposed to justice, which they purport to uphold, being served.
  • We stopped by the Greenfield PD to get our cameras and cell phones back. We were told that they would not be returned until the conclusion of the court proceedings. We also took a moment to snap a picture.
  • We had been told we could get Rich out at the Franklin Co. jail. We drove there and walked in. Our money ($500 ransom + $40 fee) was counted by the attendant and we were told he’d be down in about 30min. Then we were told that we would have to go to the Greenfield District Court to pick him up, minus the $40 fee.
  • Back at the court building I handed Rich $500 and he paid the ransom. We piled into MARV and drove back to the safety of the ’shire.
  • A few hours later Adam and I discussed the incident on Free Talk Live for an hour-and-a-half. Thanks again to Jason Talley of the Civil Disobedience Evolution Fund who gave up his seat for half the show.

We have a donations-related post in the works and will get that up soon. Thanks again to everyone who gave of their time and treasure to help us out in our time of need. Without such support it would be more difficult, both internally and logistically, to have had such an outcome. But we still have much work to do. We must not let these individuals who so willingly violated our rights continue to operate without being held accountable.

We didn’t ask for this to happen – we wanted to pay the ransom and leave Greenfield with our friend Rich, however, Dodge and his colleagues prevented that from happening. Despite doing nothing to harm the rights of anyone else, we were kidnapped, our freedom of movement was taken and our privacy was violated. Dodge and his ilk treated us as criminals because they disagreed with our views. They definitely did not uphold their Mission Statement, which, in part, notes:

The members of the Greenfield Police Department will provide the highest level of service to the community, to reduce crime and fear of crime through the enforcement of laws and the protection of life, property and the rights of all.

For us, harm to our lives, property and rights was very real and it was due to the actions of Dodge and his colleagues.

If you want to call, email or write to the folks involved to let them know what you feel about their actions, here’s contact info for the Greenfield Police Department, “Office of the Mayor”, and the Greenfield Daily Reader – the local paper. If you do contact them please feel free to share your communication as a comment below. Thanks in advance!

* * * *

Response to Comments Left by “GreenfieldPD” on

Posted on 12 July 2010 by Adam Mueller (3)

I normally wouldn’t waste my time, but considering the Greenfield police haven’t responded to me I figured this would do. “GreenfieldPD” has left several comments to which I felt the need to reply to. I’ve broken up each comment to focus on specific areas but you can read the entire comments under this post.

*I’ll refer to and assume this person is a Greenfield Police Officer because of the following statement below by him/her, “When he just went on his rant about armour piercing bullets and re-enforced doors, he made him self out to be a nut and not a person looking for what is true and just.” Though this isn’t exactly what was stated–we talked about protection–it’s a comment that only a person who helped kidnap us could make.*

You people kill me. If we did not have laws we would have anarchy. I know I do not want my kids growing up in a land with no laws and no accountability. If we did not have “man made” laws, what would we do to the people who hurt our children and steal our property. Who would make the decision as to what to do then?

Yes, without “‘man made’ laws” there would be anarchy, but anarchy is not chaos–it is order. It’s the acceptance of the non-aggression principle, the idea that people should be free to live their lives so long as they don’t initiate force against others – something many police do on a daily bases. Every time you arrest a person for a victimless crime (remember, victims are individuals, not states or governments) you’re using force, or the threat of, to steal money from them. You do this under the color of law which, to you, makes it right.

I’m also not saying that you can’t raise your kids in a society that has ‘man made’ laws, regulations and force. I’m just asking for you to let me live in my voluntary society which is absent of things of that nature. Will you allow my family to live as we wish, without sending people with guns to steal from us?

We need laws and we need people that are accountable. The best ways to fight these ‘Laws” is to get out there and get you message out. Let people know you are trying to do the right thing. Don’t just look like a crack pot by “questioning the man”. You sound like fools. Let people hear you. Post messages, hand out fliers, have rallies and try not to sound nuts. You might get people on your side. Then you vote people out of of office. That is the only way to get something done.

We don’t need man-made legislation, we need accountability, something government shields itself and its agents (like police) from. You can’t honestly say that police are held accountable to the same extent of those without badges. If I broke into someone’s home I’d be put in a cage. If I pulled someone over for a victimless crime, I’d be accused of kidnapping or something. But again you claim to have this authority over others.

No a monopoly is not the best way. Are you comparing the police to a monopoly? How do you suggest that americans live safe and productive lives without these “man made” laws. Who would punish those who have done wrong to us?

The police claim a legitimate monopoly on force. Like I stated before, and to Todd M. Dodge, if I broke into your home – like your buddies did to me – I would be locked in a cage. Even Dodge stated he’d “Fucking kill me” if I broke into his home–which isn’t a bad answer considering protection is your responsibility, not the polices’. This is something I’ll touch again on later, as there is a comment about guns coming up.

Rosa parks was a brave and dignified woman. She stood up for what was wrong and did it in a peaceful manner. She never got in anyones face and compromised their safety. Nor did the cops beat her. What happened was wrong and sense then we have grown. Not to our full potential, but progress has been made.

EXACTLY! Rosa wanted to sit in the front of the bus because she was too tired from work to walk to the back. She didn’t want to be a hero. She just wanted to SIT, a peaceful action that wasn’t violating anyone. But at that time people felt she should be in her place and not at the front. Well, how is video tapping any different? You’re statement suggest that Rosa was in the right because she was peaceful. Was I not peaceful?

Knowing yourself [talking to Brad J a former cop and contributor] how a secure facility works, you should know better than to try and film in a jail. You know it is against the rules. They knew the consequences, and they are paying the price. If everyone just went around doing what they wanted this place would be nuts. You can not have a civilized society when people can not be held accountable.

Is it against the LAW to film in a jail?? How come no one could show me the law/rule that stated no filming in jails/public spaces? How am I to know the consequences if the person who’s responsible for enforcing them can’t even tell me the law in the first place? Should you be allowed to enforce laws you can’t clearly explain? How come trespassing was the word used while at the jail? Is that because there is no law about filming in public spaces?

If the RV was in a legal spot, it should not have been towed. If it was not they have to inventory any important items. Otherwise people would say the cops are stealing from them. *eople on here have even said they are looking for theings to sue them for. But I think that was mostly you being a pain in their ass and they were repaying you.

So police have the right to deliver justice immediately? That’s what I get out of this statement, “I think that was mostly you being a pain in their ass and they were repaying you.” Is that the job of police? Is the RV in the picture parked illegally? The cops did steal from me: they took my camera, cell phone, necklace and time.

You can not expect to annoy the sh*t out of someone and not have them do it back. They are cops but thay are also human. If anyone got in my face like that and kept trying to push buttons just for the sake of pushing buttons, I would give them exactly what they wanted.

You shouldn’t be a cop then. You obviously can’t control your anger and feel that force is the only way to get people to comply. I feel bad for you. I hope at some time in your life you find a way to resolve issues in a different manner. Unless your life or life of a loved on is being threatened, the use of force should only be in defense.

The main thing here is that most of the cops I have met and worked with want to make the place they live a better place to live. That mens taking the bad guys off the streets. I very rarely see them bothering people who do not harm anyone. They go after people who victimize society.

Work hard to make the place they live better? By following laws and orders that harass and victimize peaceful people? Is that the job of police? Have you ever thought of what would happen if you privatized protection?

They get the dealers, the bullys, the wife beaters, the child abusers. I cant tell you how many times I have seen a small stash just get thrown away.

What happens when the cops are the bullies, wife beaters and abusers (not just of children)? Why did you or other police get rid of the small stash? Is it because that person wasn’t harming anyone or is it because people should be allowed to put whatever they want in their bodies? If those are the reasons then why wouldn’t your officers and jailers allow us to film and leave under the same pretense? Why did they decide to use force? Because we said no?

I know you guys are trying to do some positive things. Your just doing it in a real negative way.

I think the same thing about police and you. Instead of using reason and logic you decide to use force to get people to comply.

It sounds to me like you were the kid that poked the bees nest with a stick and then got upset with the bees when you got stung. EVERYONE has a boiling point. Cop, judge, nurse, rabbi, priest, you name it. They are PEOPLE.

I think you have this backwards. We’re the bees, the ones who will go about our business in a peaceful manner. Then police are men who will show up and poke our nest. At which time we’ll stick up for our rights and defend ourselves as well as our property.

Police should not be allowed to infringe upon peoples rights. No doubt about it. When it comes to safety and police being around other people with guns, it makes us a little uneasy. All I am saying is that if try and try and try to get a cop to do something bad, your going to get it sooner or later. You absolutely do not have the right to infringe upon anyones right to peace and quiet.

An armed society is a safe society, everyone has the right to protect themselves. It’s the initiation of force that’s wrong. The fact that cops dislike and harass people who carry firearms is a direct reflection of their need for control and compliance. I feel unsafe and more than ‘a little uneasy’ when around men in uniforms and guns. I don’t believe peace and quiet is a right, it’s a luxury. I have the right to protect myself, the right to put what I want in my body and the right to spend my money as I choose so long as I don’t initiate force against the equal negative rights of another. But peace and quiet aren’t a right… those are things people seek.

Do you think that the gang shitheads have the right to walk around with guns if they have not been convicted yet? Not a safe istuation. A normal every day person does not walk around with a gun in a civilized society. Who do you turn to when some has done something to you or your family? Just curious.

This statement was priceless, “A normal every day person does not walk around with a gun in a civilized society.” Isn’t this what cops do every day: walk (or drive cars, bikes, ect) around with guns on their hips? Oh, I bet you think all cops are trustworthy and would never use it unless they really had to. And that cops are the only ones capable of being taught such responsibility. What a joke.

I don’t think anyone has the right to restrict anyone from protecting themselves. Why should I not have the right to defend myself because some people believe my actions – which again, harmed no one – strip me of my right? “When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns.” Think about that. Taking guns from felons, such as myself, not only make me less safe, but everyone else (including cops) as I’m the type of person who would come to the aid of someone in need. I know several ‘normal every day’ people who carry firearms. They take it just as, if not more, seriously than those with badges because, unlike police, they know if they use their weapons, they will be held accountable.

And if you really want to know how a cop feels, “GreenfieldPD” lays it out in his next comment:

Even when police are held to a higher standard they should not have to deal with someone in their face all of the time rambling on and on about their rights. If someone infringes upon your rights, there is a course of action to be taken. When he just went on his rant about armour piercing bullets and re-enforced doors, he made him self out to be a nut and not a person looking for what is true and just. Do it the right way and I will stand with you. Act like a fool and you’re on your own.

Again, look at the mindset of a police officer today, “Even when police are held to a higher standard they should not have to deal with someone in their face all of the time rambling on and on about their rights.” Yeah why should anyone have to hear about those silly rights, except the right to peace and quiet which seems to have a huge value to those with badges so much that they’ll steal, abuse and punish at will whoever they please to get it.

What’s foolish to me is that you won’t even give us your name, badge number and rank. Are you that ashamed of your job that when you comment in defense of it you hide? Are you afraid others might see you and your buddies for what they are?

* * * *

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Eric Garris, Anti-War dot com

'There are Wars on the American People'

Text with video:
RussiaToday | July 07, 2010

How the land lies for U.S. military campaigns overseas? RT has been speaking to the founder of the website, Eric Garris.

* * * *
* * * *

Friday, July 2, 2010

UK and USA targeting youth for future prison sentences?

UK's Police State mirrors the US ...

Big Brother in the UK

Put young children on DNA list, urge police

· 'We must target potential offenders'
· Teachers' fury over 'dangerous' plan

[UK - The Guardian]

Primary school children should be eligible for the DNA database if they exhibit behaviour indicating they may become criminals in later life, according to Britain's most senior police forensics expert.

Gary Pugh, director of forensic sciences at Scotland Yard and the new DNA spokesman for the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo), said a debate was needed on how far Britain should go in identifying potential offenders, given that some experts believe it is possible to identify future offending traits in children as young as five.

'If we have a primary means of identifying people before they offend, then in the long-term the benefits of targeting younger people are extremely large,' said Pugh. 'You could argue the younger the better. Criminologists say some people will grow out of crime; others won't. We have to find who are possibly going to be the biggest threat to society.' [more]

* * * *


Thursday, July 1, 2010

Chuck Baldwin: FEC Attempts to Shut Down Campaign for Liberty

This blogger gets annoyed listening to Alex Jones plugging to make money for his videos during his videos. Everyone should have a right to make an honest buck. On a side note, his more controversial videos, and other posters of controversial videos on seem to load slow or stop with errors ...

I had to let the below videos load. I pressed "pause" and had to wait, and then played them.

Video Part 1:

Part 2:

Text with video:
TheAlexJonesChannel | June 30, 2010

FEC Attempts to Shut Down Campaign for Liberty

Campaign for Liberty
June 30, 2010

Dear Liberty Activist,

The FEC has launched a pair of investigations on Campaign for Liberty.

Both are meritless, but could seriously disrupt our growing program.

Please read Campaign for Liberty President John Tate's letter below and stand with us.

This is exactly the type of government action to quell liberty that I have spent my life opposing.

Congressman Ron Paul

Dear Friend of Liberty,

The best way to know you are succeeding in changing Washington is when you get attacked by the FEC.

And attack us they have!

I'm writing you this letter today not to scare you or to cry wolf. I'm writing to let you know that our success has its price, and that price right now is the wrath of the Obama Administration and its attack dogs at the Federal Election Commission.

I urge you to read this message and then sign the Declaration of Support (in which I ask for your advice on a critical legal and moral question), as we are forced into battle with federal agencies and courts.

You see, this isn't theoretical. They've already come after us in multiple cases, alleging that Campaign for Liberty has acted illegally merely by putting the candidates on the record and reporting their positions.

My attorneys tell me we are under a gag rule and cannot go in to too many details or even tell you with what we have been charged and where the charges originated.

But I can say there have been at least two complaints filed in two different states against our issue discussion activities.

They claim we are in violation of various FEC rules and laws.

Their allegations are completely false. And we must fight back now, or they will win and be able to silence our movement.

* * * *

This blogger's own complaints on the above theme:

* * * *

H.R.5175 - DISCLOSE Act

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit foreign influence in Federal elections, to prohibit government contractors from making expenditures with respect to such elections, and to establish additional disclosure requirements with respect to spending in such elections, and for other purposes. [source]

Is US to blame for world's drug problem and police state?

Is the US responsible for most of the world's hard drug problems? Heroin and cocaine would be all over the world anyway, but would they be so cheap, strong, available in such quantities if the US didn't fund its illegal covert actions, wars, domestic and international spying, and dirty black bag tricks from money the CIA rakes in smuggling drugs?

This blogger's beef with the policing and US courts brought to you by drugs:

President on Drugs: Ukrainian leader buys marijuana, cocaine online

Text with video:
RussiaToday | July 01, 2010

Ukraine's President has shown how easy it is to break the country's drug laws - by breaking them himself! He turned up at a conference on a narcotics crackdown with a stash of banned substances.